More Pages: Tyler Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42


falcon 4.0
You can't fly Falcon 4.0 without this bookOf particular importance are the anecdotes, or personal *real-life* stories that Pete presents at the head of each section. These are more than just "war" stories, they are stories with an important lesson to be learned, and they apply to the *virtual-life* experiences that you'll have in the sim. If you fly Falcon 4.0, you need this book.
Falcon Freak

Uneven in examining reproductive rightsAfter all, the advent of antiseptic surgery and antibiotics meant the driving reason behind 19th century anti-abortion campaigns was effectively negated by the post-war period, so opponents of women's rights had to construct a new justifcation for extending the laws beyond their original intent. Abortion was now dangerous because it increased women's autonomy and freedom.
While May does address reproductive policy, this work suprisingly does not delve heavily into how anti-communism and reproductive bias paralleled eachother.Considering many post-war restrictions (pregnancy-related job firing and school expulsion co-existed with illegality of abortion and contraception) were directly related to women's reproductive potential, a considerable amount of research was missing from her book. The research presented skimmed what I had already discovered from Solinger et al's other works and did not provide the insight I was desperatley seeking.
Because May is able to tie anti-communist objectives into television and other cultural arenas, I remain puzzled by the selective exclusion. However well written structurally, it also seemed as if she were skipping around the same argument, but electing not to explore it for whatever reason.
This book is not a good candidate for work with reproductive policy, but would be an excellent choice for a general study of American women's post-war political agency.
Suprisingly uneven in some placesOriginally passed in the 19th century when all surgery carried a certain degree of risk, abortion had become a fairly safe medical procedure with the advent of antiseptic surgery and antibiotics. Yet, the immediate post-war era saw massive restriction on the number of 'legal' abortions which directly contradicted medical technology's advancement. Paradoxically, when the procedure had attained a fair degree of safety, society was going to go out of it's way to remove women from their own reproductive rights.
This removal had significantly less to do with fetal rights than concern about the woman's real and future 'femininiy'. An informal and unlikely coalition of government experts, and Madison avenue set out to convince the American woman (via comericials, movies, and atrocious sitcoms) THE way to fight the communists was through their unquestioning adoption and adherence to a pre-determined gender role, because only then could she (and the nation) be 'sure' her children would grow up unmarred by communist doctorine.
While there is some information implicating newly rigid gender roles (and the related quest to contain women's sexuality--just like the containment for the communists!)in the sharp increase in abortion prosecutions and legal/cultral restrictions, it did not go in depth as much as I would have prefered. For whatever reason imaginable, May's research into this specific facet abruptly fades in and out of an otherwise solid and engrossing text.
A landmark text in the field of American StudiesTyler May's central thesis of the book is that the foreign policy of the "containment" of communism, summarized and popularized by Secretary John Foster Dulles, paralleled the rise of a domestic politics of containment, where the home space became a way to contain the economic, sexual, and social desires of both women and men. Moreover, the construction of this home space necessitated the casting of gender, sexual, and social roles in rigorous, socially compulsory terms that effectively marginalized many people from ethnic, sexual, and ideological minorities. These roles, constructed through the politics of domestic containment, were held in majority American culture to be necessary to the social survival and maintenance of capitalism in the Cold War struggle against the Soviets. Women in particular, are focused on, as the strong, independent, single role models of the 1930's gave way to increased imagery of the married, safely domesticated woman, who were under heavy societal pressure to give birth and raise children. Men too were constrained by corporate superiors, and looked to home as the one place they could exercise full influence over their wives and children. Not everyone, of course, was happy with this.
A number of surprising arguments are made and defended in this book as sub-theses to the greater point. Birth control achieved social acceptance quickly during this time, albeit "contained" in such a way as to officially promote family expansion and lower the marriage age. Fulfilled eroticism, albeit only in marriage, becomes a central point of majority discourse, to the point that women were counseled to pour more energy into their mates' fulfillment, sexual and otherwise, than the children of the household. (this is not to say those actual sexual attitudes and practices always reflected these images, as she points out on pg. 102) The Cold War demanded that the excesses of capitalism (in promoting huge differentials between rich and poor) had to be checked, lest communism breed and flourish in the nation's slums (147). Fewer African-American women went to college than white, but more of them graduated proportionately. May even shows that the so-called Baby Boom didn't start after the war, but rather in the early part of WWII, thus dispelling the common notion peace and affluence alone created the baby boom (these conditions also existed after WWI, but with no population boom.)
Another excellent aspect of this study, besides nuancing the role of the Cold War, is the inclusion and careful use of quantitative data, the Kelly Longitudinal Studies---these were surveys taken among housewives and husbands (white ones, to be sure) and they reveal a wealth of data. Rather than painting a picture of comfortable domesticity, these surveys reflect a great deal of dissatisfaction among women (and men) coping with these rigid gender roles. Women who worked in industry during the war had mixed feelings at best being relegated back to the home. Sexuality, motherhood, all of these things proved ultimately unfulfilling for many women in the surveys, causing guilt and resentment in the supposedly "placid" generation.
Tyler May leaves important parties out of her study. Black women, for example, are discussed rarely, and the labor and civil rights movements (which start in the 1950's, not the 60's) are not part of this story. Subsequent scholarship ("Not June Cleaver", "Tupperware") has demonstrated that even in this time, women created counternarratives to compulsory domesticity, that allowed many to ameliorate and contest, if not wholly counter, these discourses. But what Tyler May demonstrates is that these majority discourses of political and domestic containment maintained a definitive hegemony over the public discussions of the day, and held wide sway in the larger culture. Especially through media representations of that time period, these operative models of domestic containment and placidness tend to guide, somewhat incorrectly, popular collective memories of that time period. This fact only serves to further underscore their continued influence.
Christopher W. Chase - PhD Fellow, Michigan State Univ.


Not her best,but enjoyable none the less
Very Good
a great sensual book

Informative, well-written...but a little too biased...Where the book falls short for me is in its bias toward the subject. Most of the other biographies I have read have some kind of bias toward their subject; that may be inevitable. But I thought this one had a little more than I thought was adequate. Clearly, Tyler was a likable and principled man and politics then were possibly uglier than they are now, but I think that he had more to do with his own political misfortunes than the author claims.
Still, despite my three-star rating, I thought this is a must-read for aficionados interested in this particular president. If you're interested in the period leading to the Civil War, I can think of many other books and biographies that may provide a better account.
Portrait of a Confused ManNow, for the author. Chitwood is a classic apologist. He tried so hard to defend Tyler that his narrative turned defensive. He also did not criticize Tyler when it was obviously necessary and heaped praise upon him for confusing and inconsistent views. For example, when John Tyler argued in 1820 that slavery could be abolished if it were allowed to expand into the Missouri territory, Chitwood called the argument "brilliant."(p. 49) His argument may have been novel, innovative, creative, but not brilliant!
Excellent life of an underrated president and statesman.Readers interested in the controversy over Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings will find page 102 of this book especially interesting; Texans will cheer Tyler, even if they don't like Secretary of State John C. Calhoun's tactics; and Virginia natives will appreciate a politician who promised to put Virginia first, then did. Tyler's only period of sordid, political calculation came in the constitutional convention of 1829-1830, when he took a back seat to B.W. Leigh in order to avoid riling one section of the state against himself. This minor glitch can surely be overlooked in a career as laudable as Tyler's.
Chitwood criticizes Tyler for not helping smoothe the way from slavery to a free society, and there's much to lament there. The fact that this book was published in 1939 means that it is devoid of the republican/liberal debate that dominated the historiography over the past 20 years. Rush out, then, and buy it! (I got my copy at "Sherwood Forest," President Tyler's James River estate in Virginia, which is run as a public attraction by the president's descendants. Although John Tyler was born in 1790, his *grandson* lives in the house today!)


Sorry thats two for two .....The book deals with Lissa, a young art historian, California girl, in the UK under the spell of doctor Colin. The two of them meet during their travels in Europe and I guess it took Collin like 3 seconds to get Lissa in his bed to spank and you know what ....
Lissas immediate submission is explained later in the book since Collin and Lissas ex belong to the same worldwide underground fetish, I guess, club. Members are ID'd by some stupid pinthey wear.... don't know if anyone shoud trust a man wering pins of any kind .... Most of the book deals with Lissas being a bad bad little girl and Collin spanking his bad bad little girl. This interplay of conversation goes on so much in the book, 'Are you bad bad girl ...' that honest to goodness I had the urge to spank Collin to shut the heck up!
For me to enjoy eroticism in a book there has to be some kind of sin in it to make it sizzle, there should be some pursuit, capture and ultimate submission to add spice, and, of course we have none of that in this book. What we have is two people that just seem to enjoy spanking and babbling while it's going on.
Another hot Alison Tyler book
Spanking enthusiasts take note... this book sizzles!

Good Environmental Biology Text
AWESOME TEXT!!
superb ecology intro....I like the "liberal" slant--in other words, the call to quit being the world's biggest consumer and polluter and create a sustainable society with more realistic values than the dream of unlimited expansion--but then I can't think of anything more insane than allowing the world to overheat so the oil empires can go on making money.
Anyway, major sections covered include:
Humans and Nature: An Overview
Some Concepts of Ecology
Population, Resources, and Pollution
Environment and Society
I'm glad I bought mine used; the publisher is nuts for charging this much money for a textbook, no matter how well-crafted.


Not too naughty
Surprisingly good writing
Deliciously Sexy...

Clever, teasingly fun, tight pacing, enticing!
A very nice read; interesting and well-paced action.
A great book for golf enthusiasts!

not even worth the paper it's printed on
Revolution by Simplicity!
Form, space, & disorder?

SUCKS
Very Good
More proof that official strategy guides are the best!!!